netdev - Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000000b0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:54:29 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
 address 000000b0

Krzysztof Oledzki a écrit :
> 
> 
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
>> Krzysztof Oledzki a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>
>>>> Krzysztof Oledzki a écrit :
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Today I found in my logs:
>>>>>
>>>>> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual 
>>>>> address 000000b0
>>>>>  printing eip:
>>>>> 78395f65
>>>>> *pde = 00000000
>>>>> Oops: 0000 [#1]
>>>>> PREEMPT SMP
>>>>> CPU:    0
>>>>> EIP:    0060:[<78395f65>]    Not tainted VLI
>>>>> EFLAGS: 00210286   (2.6.22.9 #1)
>>>>> EIP is at __ip_route_output_key+0x412/0x722
>>>>> eax: 80000000   ebx: 00000000   ecx: 5dd2b1c3   edx: 00000000
>>>>> esi: 00000000   edi: d44c7e30   ebp: ec8c4980   esp: d44c7ddc
>>>>> ds: 007b   es: 007b   fs: 00d8  gs: 0033  ss: 0068
>>>>> Process smtpd (pid: 12479, ti=d44c6000 task=9e759510 task.ti=d44c6000)
>>>>> Stack: d44c7e7c d44c7e7c d44c7eb8 00000000 d44c7e7c 00000000 
>>>>> 00000000 00000005
>>>>>        00000000 ffffffff 5dd2b1c3 00000000 00000000 00000000 
>>>>> 00000000 00000000
>>>>>        00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00030000 
>>>>> 00000000 d44c7e7c
>>>>> Call Trace:
>>>>>  [<78396280>] ip_route_output_flow+0xb/0x3e
>>>>>  [<783b2b29>] ip4_datagram_connect+0x1c9/0x308
>>>>>  [<783ba70a>] inet_dgram_connect+0x45/0x4e
>>>>>  [<7837135e>] sys_connect+0x72/0x9c
>>>>>  [<78371607>] sock_map_fd+0x41/0x4a
>>>>>  [<7840d1b1>] _spin_lock+0x33/0x3e
>>>>>  [<7840d623>] _spin_unlock+0x25/0x3b
>>>>>  [<78371607>] sock_map_fd+0x41/0x4a
>>>>>  [<78372792>] sys_socketcall+0x8f/0x242
>>>>>  [<7813e99c>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x122/0x14c
>>>>>  [<78103dc6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x8f/0x99
>>>>>  [<78103d96>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99
>>>>>  =======================
>>>>> Code: fa e0 00 00 00 75 07 c6 44 24 56 05 eb 14 81 fa f0 00 00 00 
>>>>> 0f 84 e1 02 00 00 84 c0 0f 84 d9 02 00 00 8b 44 24 0c 0d 00 00 00 
>>>>> 80 <f6> 86 b0 00 00 00 08 0f 44 44 24 0c 89 44 24 0c b8 01 00 00 00
>>>>> EIP: [<78395f65>] __ip_route_output_key+0x412/0x722 SS:ESP 
>>>>> 0068:d44c7ddc
>>>>>
>>>>> Shortly before it there was:
>>>>> Oct 17 07:17:55 cougar postfix/master[3400]: warning: process 
>>>>> /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 12479 killed by signal 11
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>                 Krzysztof Olędzki
>>>>
>>>> Hello Krzysztof
>>>>
>>>> Could you give us some details about this ? kernel version at least.
>>>
>>> Yes, I was little to hurry sending this bug report. Anyway, it is 
>>> 2.6.22.9 like mentioned in the oops: EFLAGS: 00210286 (2.6.22.9 #1)
>>>
>>>> (you could for example take a look at REPORTING-BUGS, or run
>>>> scripts/ver_linux)
>>>
>>> Linux cougar 2.6.22.9 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Oct 3 10:24:19 CEST 2007 
>>> i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.20GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
>>>
>>> Gnu C                  4.1.2
>>> Gnu make               3.81
>>> binutils               2.17
>>> util-linux             2.12r
>>> mount                  2.12r
>>> module-init-tools      3.2.2
>>> e2fsprogs              1.40.2
>>> Linux C Library        > libc.2.5
>>> Dynamic linker (ldd)   2.5
>>> Procps                 3.2.7
>>> Net-tools              1.60
>>> Kbd                    1.12
>>> Sh-utils               6.9
>>>
>>
>> Yes indeed, version was on your initial report.
>>
>> It seems this kernel is unusual (VMSPLIT_2G_OPT instead of stdandard 
>> VMSPLIT_3G), any chance you provide full .config ?
> 
> Attached, both .config and dmesg.
> 

Hum, you are using IPT_TPROXY thing, which is not in linux-2.6.22.9

I have no idea how this can taint the kernel, since you provide no information.

Try to reproduce the problem with a genuine kernel.

Thank you

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html