netdev - Re: [IFGROUPv4 2/3] Interface group: core (netlink) part

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:14:46 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Laszlo Attila Toth <panther@...abit.hu>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [IFGROUPv4 2/3] Interface group: core (netlink) part

Laszlo Attila Toth wrote:
> Interface groups let handle different interfaces together
> especially in netfilter modules.
> Modified net device structure and netlink interface.
> 
> @@ -891,6 +895,13 @@ static int do_setlink(struct net_device *dev, struct ifinfomsg *ifm,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (tb[IFLA_IFGROUP]) {
> +		write_lock_bh(&dev_base_lock);
> +		dev->ifgroup = nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_IFGROUP]);
> +		write_unlock_bh(&dev_base_lock);
> +		modified = 1;
> +	}

The locking looks unnecessary, the rtnl should be enough.
I'm not even sure why its used for operstate and linkmode,
AFAICS they are also protected by the rtnl.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html