netdev - Re: [UDP6]: Restore sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:41:50 +0900 (JST)
From:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 
	<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To:	mitch@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [UDP6]: Restore sk_filter optimisation

In article <20071029153320.d2c00f62.mitch@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> (at Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:33:20 +0900), Mitsuru Chinen <mitch@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> says:

> Hello Herbert,
> 
> Let me ask a question about this patch.
> After this patch was applied, 2 of the protocol stack behaviors were
> changed when it receives a UDP datagram with broken checksum:
> 
>  1. udp6InDatagrams is incremented instead of udpInErrors
>  2. In userland, recvfrom() replies an error with EAGAIN.
>     recvfrom() wasn't aware of such a packet before.
> 
> Are these changes intentional?

And, we're not sure how much the "optimization"'s benefit is.
It is even worse when we are handling multicast packets.

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html