netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce john-users owl-users popa3d-users / xvendor oss-security / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Order Openwall GNU/*/Linux 2.0 on a CD with delivery worldwide

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dada1@...mosbay.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET_NS=n case code

From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:58:59 +0100

> I agree with you that with current state, this atomic_inc/atomic_dec_and_test 
> wont come in profiles unless a trivial bench is writen
> 
> for(;;){close(socket(....));}

Just add one packet send and one packet receive in there and you have
a transaction workload.  It's really not that unrealistic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html