netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] SOCK: add raw6 drops counter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:45:33 +0800
From:	Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] SOCK: add raw6 drops counter

Eric Dumazet said the following on 2007-11-14 13:48:
>> diff -Nurp linux-2.6.24-rc2.org/net/ipv6/raw.c
>> linux-2.6.24-rc2/net/ipv6/raw.c
>> --- linux-2.6.24-rc2.org/net/ipv6/raw.c    2007-11-09
>> 16:38:05.000000000 +0800
>> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc2/net/ipv6/raw.c    2007-11-14 09:46:54.000000000
>> +0800
>> @@ -354,14 +354,14 @@ static inline int rawv6_rcv_skb(struct s
>>  {
>>      if ((raw6_sk(sk)->checksum || sk->sk_filter) &&
>>          skb_checksum_complete(skb)) {
>> -        /* FIXME: increment a raw6 drops counter here */
>> +        atomic_inc(&sk->sk_drops);   
> 
> I am not sure the comment was refering to a per socket counter here.
> 
> If the frame checksum is bad, we can not be sure the socket is OK, since
> the garbaged bits could be in the tuple that identify the socket.
> 
> Maybe here we want to increment a global raw6 drop counter (well, for
> the given ipv6 instance)
> 

What the /proc/net/raw6 shows is statistical information about raw socket
in IPv6 stack. And the information is per socket per row. 
So I think it's better to count it to per socket.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html