lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:59:04 +0000 From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk> To: Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com> Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] SNMP: Decrement of UDP InDatagrams for bad checksum | If there is no socket filter, a bad checksum udp packet will be queued and | ready for user to read. At the same time the InDatagrams is increased. | So we need to decrement InDatagrams when recvmsg() or poll() notice the | bad checksum. | | Seems Gerrit had fix it a year ago.(http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/28/218) | But it's not in kernel now. So I make the same patch for 2.6.24.rc2. | The problem is known: packets with failed checksums will still increment InDatagrams. The solution is also known (as acknowledged above). I remember the discussion about this kind of solution: the problem is apparently that these variables may sit on different CPUs, so that first incrementing, and then later decrementing, would not have the desired effect. Desirable would be to only increment InDatagrams after passing all the checksum tests (i.e. in udp_recvmsg). This solution was also discussed on netdev, but people said that this would lead to trouble with the data_ready handler (notably NFS). | If this patch ok, I will make the same one for IPv6 UDP. | | [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] SNMP: Decrement of UDP InDatagrams for bad checksum | Decrement UDP InDatagrams for bad checksum UDP packet in ready queue. | | Signed-off-by: Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com> | --- | include/net/snmp.h | 2 ++ | include/net/udp.h | 3 +++ | net/ipv4/udp.c | 2 ++ | 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+) | | diff -Nurp linux-2.6.24-rc2.org/include/net/snmp.h linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/net/snmp.h | --- linux-2.6.24-rc2.org/include/net/snmp.h 2007-11-09 16:37:08.000000000 +0800 | +++ linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/net/snmp.h 2007-11-16 16:57:51.000000000 +0800 | @@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ struct linux_mib { | (per_cpu_ptr(mib[!in_softirq()], raw_smp_processor_id())->mibs[field]++) | #define SNMP_DEC_STATS(mib, field) \ | (per_cpu_ptr(mib[!in_softirq()], raw_smp_processor_id())->mibs[field]--) | +#define SNMP_DEC_STATS_BH(mib, field) \ | + (per_cpu_ptr(mib[0], raw_smp_processor_id())->mibs[field]--) | #define SNMP_ADD_STATS_BH(mib, field, addend) \ | (per_cpu_ptr(mib[0], raw_smp_processor_id())->mibs[field] += addend) | #define SNMP_ADD_STATS_USER(mib, field, addend) \ | diff -Nurp linux-2.6.24-rc2.org/include/net/udp.h linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/net/udp.h | --- linux-2.6.24-rc2.org/include/net/udp.h 2007-11-09 16:37:08.000000000 +0800 | +++ linux-2.6.24-rc2/include/net/udp.h 2007-11-16 16:58:41.000000000 +0800 | @@ -148,6 +148,9 @@ DECLARE_SNMP_STAT(struct udp_mib, udp_st | #define UDP_INC_STATS_BH(field, is_udplite) do { \ | if (is_udplite) SNMP_INC_STATS_BH(udplite_statistics, field); \ | else SNMP_INC_STATS_BH(udp_statistics, field); } while(0) | +#define UDP_DEC_STATS_BH(field, is_udplite) do { \ | + if (is_udplite) SNMP_DEC_STATS_BH(udplite_statistics, field); \ | + else SNMP_DEC_STATS_BH(udp_statistics, field); } while(0) | | /* /proc */ | struct udp_seq_afinfo { | diff -Nurp linux-2.6.24-rc2.org/net/ipv4/udp.c linux-2.6.24-rc2/net/ipv4/udp.c | --- linux-2.6.24-rc2.org/net/ipv4/udp.c 2007-11-09 16:37:57.000000000 +0800 | +++ linux-2.6.24-rc2/net/ipv4/udp.c 2007-11-16 15:02:44.000000000 +0800 | @@ -897,6 +897,7 @@ out: | | csum_copy_err: | UDP_INC_STATS_BH(UDP_MIB_INERRORS, is_udplite); | + UDP_DEC_STATS_BH(UDP_MIB_INDATAGRAMS, is_udplite); | | skb_kill_datagram(sk, skb, flags); | | @@ -1416,6 +1417,7 @@ unsigned int udp_poll(struct file *file, | while ((skb = skb_peek(rcvq)) != NULL && | udp_lib_checksum_complete(skb)) { | UDP_INC_STATS_BH(UDP_MIB_INERRORS, is_lite); | + UDP_DEC_STATS_BH(UDP_MIB_INDATAGRAMS, is_lite); | __skb_unlink(skb, rcvq); | kfree_skb(skb); | } | | -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists