netdev - Re: [PATCH net-2.6.25 0/4] Convert IP4 address class macros to inline functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:42:33 +0900
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@...core.fi>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...eworks.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6.25 0/4] Convert IP4 address class macros to inline functions

On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:18:44PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 16:06 +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:40:12PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Change LOOPBACK MULTICAST LOCAL_MCAST BADCLASS and ZERONET
> > > macros to inline functions ipv4_is_<type>(__be32 addr)
> > > Adds some type safety and arguably some readability
> > > No change in compiled image size
> > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> > I can understand the motivation for moving the functionality into
> > inline functions in order to get some type safety. But what is
> > the motivation for changing all the macro calls to function calls,
> > when you have set up the marcos to call the appropriate functions?
> 
> It's just a sequence that allows the kernel to compile.
> 
> I expect to remove the macros when the other callsites,
> drivers/infiniband and drivers/parisc, are converted.
> 
> > Surely if you want to do that you should just ditch the marcos all
> > together. Perhaps I am missing a patch?
> 
> That's what I'd like to do but in sequence.
> 
> David Miller can reasonably accept the net changes, but
> I'm not too sure he can accept the drivers changes.
> 
> If/when this change is accepted and patches for drivers are
> accepted, I'll submit a patch to remove the macros.

Thanks for the clarification. I realised after I sent my
mail that you were probably having to cope with other callers.

> > Also, as the function names are longer than the macro name
> > you are creating lines that are > 80 columns wide that used
> > not to be in that state. For my eyes that reduced readability
> > (substantially).
> 
> David? You want a patch for that too?

-- 
Horms

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html