netdev - Re: [Bridge] Re: [RFC] bridging: don't forward EAPOL frames

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:24:01 -0500
From:	"Andy Gospodarek" <andy@...yhouse.net>
To:	"Johannes Berg" <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	"Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	bridge <bridge@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] Re: [RFC] bridging: don't forward EAPOL frames

On Nov 27, 2007 8:24 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
>
> > > +   if (unlikely(skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_PAE)))
> > > +           goto drop;
> > > +
> > >     switch (p->state) {
> > >     case BR_STATE_FORWARDING:
> >
> > Not needed because the bridge is already handling it:
> >
> > 1) If running STP (ie true bridge), then all link local multicast is only received by
> > the bridge and never forwarded.
>
> Well, typical access point setups bridge the wireless AP interface with
> wired, EAPOL frames can be unicast (and 802.11 specifies to do so) and
> we want to avoid having them unicast to another host.
>
> Also, 802.1X in C.3.3 recommends not bridging the *ethertype* rather
> than depending on the link-local multicast address because otherwise
> eapol frames can be unicast into the network behind the (authorized)
> port which is undesirable.
>
> johannes
>
>

I agree with Stephen, that based on the way it's likely people use
linux bridges it seems like this is something that could be configured
rather than simply dropping those frames without any chance to forward
them.  There are probably quite a few people out there who will not
expect this change, so it should be easy to change during runtime.

Don't forget that a simple ebtables rule could also drop EAPOL if needed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html