netdev - Re: wireless vs. alignment requirements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:42:26 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, dsd@...too.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wireless vs. alignment requirements

Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> 
> Is there any standard kernel config define for "this platform can't do
> unaligned accesses"?
> 

Not that I know of, but there should be.

To be somewhat more complexicated, some platforms (e.g. MIPS) can do 
unaligned references quite cheaply, but they need different opcodes to 
do so.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html