netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:31:27 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sam@...nborg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.

On Wednesday 28 November 2007 17:48:17 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:06:45AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 03:00:22PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >...
> > > of a modular ipv6 is flawed. 
> > 
> > Modules that cannot be unloaded are still useful. Standard case: Distributions
> > like to offer an option to not use ipv6 because that is popular workaround
> > for the common "DNS server eats AAAA queries and causes delays" issue.
> > Forcing the user to rebuild the kernel for this wouldn't be practical.
> > If ipv6 wasn't modular that would be hard to do.
> 
> It should be trivial doing it similar to the selinux=0 boot option.

They safe also a few hundred KB of memory this way.
I know it is not en vogue anymore to care about memory bloat, but
I personally like that.

-Andi 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html