netdev - Re: [PATCHv6 iptables]Interface group match

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:15:27 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
CC:	panther@...abit.hu, Lutz Jaenicke <ljaenicke@...ominate.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 iptables]Interface group match

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Nov 29 2007 17:27, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> The syntax "name/0xmask" is simply too strange for me.
>> Then how about name/name with masks also defined in rt_ifgroup?
>> The same question applies for marks of course.
>>
> I would find that confusing, which is why the new xt_TOS only
> allows names when no /mask or a mask of /allbits is used.

Its still useful, you don't have to use it :) Another alternative
would be to allow defining names to val/mask.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html