netdev - Re: [PATCHv7 1/5] Remove unnecessary locks from rtnetlink (in do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:13:04 +0100
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To:	Laszlo Attila Toth <panther@...abit.hu>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 1/5] Remove unnecessary locks from rtnetlink (in do_setlink)

Laszlo Attila Toth wrote, On 11/29/2007 05:11 PM:

> The do_setlink function is protected by rtnl, additional locks are unnecessary,
> and the set_operstate() function is called from protected parts. Locks removed
> from both functions.

It doesn't look like in accordance with a comment to dev_base_lock in dev.c.
And it makes eg. rfc2863_policy() locking from link_watch.c looking strange.
Isn't there needed some additional comment to this?

Regards,
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html