lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 00:16:43 +1100 From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> Cc: Hideo AOKI <haoki@...hat.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Satoshi Oshima <satoshi.oshima.fk@...achi.com>, Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, Yumiko Sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] udp: memory accounting in IPv4 On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 02:08:31PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > I agree adding yet another atomics ops is a big problem. > > Another idea, coupled with recent work on percpu storage done by Christoph > Lameter, would be to use kind of a percpu_counter : Yes that's an interesting idea. > We dont really need strong and precise memory accounting (UDP , but TCP as > well), just some kind of limit to avoid memory to be too much used. BTW it's no big deal for TCP because it's completely serialised so it doesn't use atomic ops for the accounting. More importantly, it uses sk_forward_alloc so not every packet needs to touch the global counter. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists