netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/3] [NET] phy/fixed.c: rework to not duplicate PHY layer functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:59:52 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Vitaly Bordug <vitb@...nel.crashing.org>
CC:	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [NET] phy/fixed.c: rework to not duplicate PHY layer
 functionality

Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> With that patch fixed.c now fully emulates MDIO bus, thus no need
> to duplicate PHY layer functionality. That, in turn, drastically
> simplifies the code, and drops down line count.
> 
> As an additional bonus, now there is no need to register MDIO bus
> for each PHY, all emulated PHYs placed on the platform fixed MDIO bus.
> There is also no more need to pre-allocate PHYs via .config option,
> this is all now handled dynamically.
> 
> p.s. Don't even try to understand patch content! Better: apply patch
> and look into resulting drivers/net/phy/fixed.c.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <vitb@...nel.crashing.org>

what's the context of this patchset?  2.6.25?

it's late for 2.6.24-rc, IMO.

Do I have the latest version (sent Nov 26 @ 9:29am)?

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html