netdev - Re: [PATCH net-2.6.25 1/6][CORE] Remove unneeded ifdefs from sysctl_net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 03 Dec 2007 04:06:48 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6.25 1/6][CORE] Remove unneeded ifdefs from sysctl_net_core.c

Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org> writes:

> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org> writes:
>> 
>>> They include the whole file, but it is already compiled
>>> out when SYSCTL=n, since it is obj-$(CONFIG_SYSCTL) target
>>> in the Makefile.
>> 
>> Pavel thanks for sending these patches.  Might I ask
>> for some level of acknowledgement when you rework one of
>> my patches and send it off.
>
> Sure. I though I've been doing exactly this thing. I've said
> that unix ctls were from your tree and so on.

Ok.  I guess I must have overlooked that attribution.

>> I suppose this could be a case of duplicate thinking but
>> this patch looks very familiar.
>
> Hm... Do you mean that this one is from your tree? Sorry then,
> I didn't know this. I can resend it with From: <you> if you wish.

It is.  But I don't see any of this as needing a resend.  Please
just don't forget me in the future is all I ask.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html