lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:54:29 +0100 From: Ariane Keller <ariane.keller@....ee.ethz.ch> To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com> CC: Ariane Keller <ariane.keller@....ee.ethz.ch>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, Rainer Baumann <baumann@....ee.ethz.ch> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] netem: trace enhancement I thought about that as well, but in my opinion this does not help much. It's the same as before: in average every 10ms a new buffer needs to be filled. Ben Greear wrote: > Ariane Keller wrote: >> >> Increasing the cache size to say 32k for each buffer would be no problem. >> Is this enough? > Maybe just a variable length list of 4k buffers chained together? Its > usually easier > to get 4k chunks of memory than 32k chunks, especially under high > network load, > and if you go ahead an make it arbitrary length, then each user can > determine how many > they want to have queued... > > Thanks, > Ben > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists