netdev - Re: [PATCH] [IPv4] Reply net unreachable ICMP message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:14:21 +0900
From:	Mitsuru Chinen <mitch@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [IPv4] Reply net unreachable ICMP message

On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 08:49:47 +0100
Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl> wrote:

> On 06-12-2007 07:31, Mitsuru Chinen wrote:
> > IPv4 stack doesn't reply any ICMP destination unreachable message
> > with net unreachable code when IP detagrams are being discarded
> > because of no route could be found in the forwarding path.
> > Incidentally, IPv6 stack replies such ICMPv6 message in the similar
> > situation.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mitsuru Chinen <mitch@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  net/ipv4/route.c |    2 ++
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
> > index 6714bbc..ba85ec9 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/route.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
> > @@ -1375,6 +1375,7 @@ static int ip_error(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >  			break;
> >  		case ENETUNREACH:
> >  			code = ICMP_NET_UNREACH;
> > +			IP_INC_STATS_BH(IPSTATS_MIB_INNOROUTES);
> >  			break;
> >  		case EACCES:
> >  			code = ICMP_PKT_FILTERED;
> > @@ -2004,6 +2005,7 @@ no_route:
> >  	RT_CACHE_STAT_INC(in_no_route);
> >  	spec_dst = inet_select_addr(dev, 0, RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE);
> >  	res.type = RTN_UNREACHABLE;
> > +	err = -ENETUNREACH;
> >  	goto local_input;
> >  
> >  	/*
> 
> This patch seems to be wrong. It overrides err codes from
> fib_lookup, where such decisions should be made.

fib_lookup() replies -ESRCH in this situation.
It is necessary to override the variable by the suitable error
number like the code under e_hostunreach label.

Best Regards,
----
Mitsuru Chinen <mitch@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html