netdev - Re: IPsec replay sequence number overflow behavior? (RFC4303 section 3.3.3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:43:56 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	latten@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: IPsec replay sequence number overflow behavior? (RFC4303 section 3.3.3)

On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:16:36AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> Won't this break with manually installed SAs (without a keying
> daemon)?

Well what's being suggested here will already break that anyway :)

Alternatively we can take the interpretation that it's the KM's
responsibility to set the appropriate hard life time if ESNs are
not in use.

Either way is fine with me.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html