netdev - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9543] New: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (2164)/RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv4/devinet.c (1055)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:04:27 +0100 (CET)
From:	Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9543] New: RTNL: assertion failed at
 net/ipv6/addrconf.c (2164)/RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv4/devinet.c
 (1055)



On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 03:20:48 -0800 (PST) bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
>
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9543
>>
>>            Summary: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c
>>                     (2164)/RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv4/devinet.c
>>                     (1055)
>>            Product: Drivers
>>            Version: 2.5
>>      KernelVersion: 2.6.24-rc4-git7
>>           Platform: All
>>         OS/Version: Linux
>>               Tree: Mainline
>>             Status: NEW
>>           Severity: normal
>>           Priority: P1
>>          Component: Network
>>         AssignedTo: jgarzik@...ox.com
>>         ReportedBy: olel@....pl
>>
>>
>> Most recent kernel where this bug did not occur: 2.6.23
>> Distribution: Gentoo
>>
>> Problem Description:
>> ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): bond0: link becomes ready
>> RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (2164)
>> Pid: 9, comm: events/0 Not tainted 2.6.24-rc4-git7 #1
>>  [<78402cfb>] addrconf_notify+0x5b4/0x7b7
>>  [<7812203a>] finish_task_switch+0x0/0x8c
>>  [<781346ff>] worker_thread+0x0/0x85
>>  [<78438e23>] schedule+0x545/0x55f
>>  [<781408d1>] print_lock_contention_bug+0x11/0xd2
>>  [<783bfa72>] rt_run_flush+0x43/0x8b
>>  [<783bfa93>] rt_run_flush+0x64/0x8b
>>  [<7813ac54>] notifier_call_chain+0x2a/0x52
>>  [<7813ac9e>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x17/0x1a
>>  [<783a3471>] netdev_state_change+0x18/0x29
>>  [<783ac6a9>] __linkwatch_run_queue+0x150/0x17e
>>  [<783ac6f4>] linkwatch_event+0x1d/0x22
>>  [<78133cdf>] run_workqueue+0xdb/0x1b6
>>  [<78133c8b>] run_workqueue+0x87/0x1b6
>>  [<783ac6d7>] linkwatch_event+0x0/0x22
>>  [<781346ff>] worker_thread+0x0/0x85
>>  [<78134778>] worker_thread+0x79/0x85
>>  [<781371ad>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x35
>>  [<781370f6>] kthread+0x38/0x5e
>>  [<781370be>] kthread+0x0/0x5e
>>  [<78104baf>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
>>  =======================
>> RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (1610)
>
>
> Hopefully this is due to the bug you reported in bug #9542.
>
> Does this patch fix both issues?

Unfortunately not. I just updated bugzilla.

Best regards,

 				Krzysztof Olędzki