[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:38:37 -0800
From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To: "Joonwoo Park" <joonwpark81@...il.com>
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [NET]: Fix Ooops of napi net_rx_action.
Joonwoo Park wrote:
> 2007/12/12, Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>:
>>
>> all drivers using NAPI in 2.6.24+ (NNAPI??) must return zero here,
>> after calling netif_rx_complete. netif_rx_complete plus work_done
>> != 0 causes a bug.
>>
>
> Brandeburg,
> Don't we need to return non-zero work_done after netif_rx_complete if
> work_done != weight?
Actually we just need to make sure we don't return work_done == weight
as it is checked on line 2210 of dev.c.
I should also note that I was wrong above, and that the requirement is
that we MUST not return work_done == weight when indicating
netif_rx_complete.
So, returning 0 when we actually did some work, but are being removed
from the poll list because something like !netif_running, is probably
okay, but I'm sure someone will disagree with me. Maybe returning like
this would be better
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
index 724f067..76d5e3b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
@@ -3933,6 +3933,10 @@ quit_polling:
e1000_set_itr(adapter);
netif_rx_complete(poll_dev, napi);
e1000_irq_enable(adapter);
+ if (work_done == weight)
+ return work_done - 1;
+ else
+ return work_done;
}
return work_done;
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists