netdev - ESFQ (or SFQ updates) mainline status?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:21:15 -0800
From:	Jeff Gustafson <ncjeffgus@...age.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: ESFQ (or SFQ updates) mainline status?

Hi all,
	I have a question about the status of the spiffy updates to SFQ.  I
*really* like the ESFQ idea.  I appears to be exactly what I'm looking
for.  From what I can tell from this mailing list, SFQ is getting some
or all of the ESFQ features.  Although the ESFQ web site gives detailed
information about the status for inclusion in mainline, I am having
trouble finding out exactly what (if any) parts of ESFQ got into SFQ in
mainline.
	Did any of the ESFQ-like enhancements for SFQ reach .23 or do I still
need to patch?  I am running a stripped-down Fedora 8 box and it would
be very convenient if the patches were already in .23 or added by the
Fedora team.
	I tried to run the ESFQ command against SFQ, but the command was
rejected:

/sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:12 handle 12: sfq perturb 10 hash
ctnatchg

	It appears the even if the kernel does have the patches, the shipped
version tc does not.

				..Jeff


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html