netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/4] [XFRM]: Kill some bloat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:54:58 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	andi@...stfloor.org
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com, paul.moore@...com,
	latten@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] [XFRM]: Kill some bloat

From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:23:11 +0100

> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> 
> > Similarly I question just about any inline usage at all in *.c files
> 
> Don't forget the .h files. Especially a lot of stuff in tcp.h should
> be probably in some .c file and not be inline.

I explicitly left them out.

Most of them are abstractions of common 2 or 3 instruction
calculations, and thus should stay inline.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html