lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:36:38 +0100 (CET) From: Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl> To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com> cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] bonding: 3 fixes for 2.6.24 On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl> wrote: > >> Fine. Just let you know that someone test your patches and everything >> works, except mentioned problem. > > And I appreciate it; I just wanted to make sure our many fans > following along at home didn't misunderstand. > > Could you let me know if the patch below make the lockdep > warning go away? This applies on top of the previous three, although it > should be trivial to do by hand. > > I'm still checking to make sure this is safe with regard to > mutexing the bonding structures, but it would be good to know if it > eliminates the warning. I can confirm that the warning went away. Tested-by: Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki <ole@....pl> Best regards, Krzysztof Olędzki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists