lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:47:07 -0600
From:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: questions on NAPI processing latency and dropped network	packets

Jarek Poplawski wrote:

> IMHO, checking this with a current stable, which probably you are going
> to do some day, anyway, should be 100% acceptable: giving some input to
> netdev, while still working for yourself.

While I would love to do this, it's not that simple.

Some of our hardware is not supported on mainline, so we need per-kernel 
version patches to even bring up the blade.  The blades netboot via a 
jumbo-frame network, so kernel extensions are needed to handle setting 
the MTU before mounting the rootfs.  The blade in question uses CKRM 
which doesn't exist for newer kernels so the problem may simply be 
hidden by scheduling differences.  The userspace application uses other 
kernel features that are not in mainline (and likely some of them won't 
ever be in mainline--I know because I've tried).

Basically, the number of changes required for our environment makes it 
difficult to just boot up the latest kernel.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists