netdev - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9816] New: cannot replace route

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:10:26 +0100
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, joonwpark81@...il.com,
	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, schwab@...e.de
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9816] New: cannot replace route

On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:20:26PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
> That's not a very good analogy - the source is a kernel object.  A better
> example would be:
> 
> linux-2.6.24-rc8:
> 
> echo foo > /tmp/1
> echo bar > /tmp/2
> echo foo > /tmp/1
> 
> linux-2.6.24:
> 
> echo foo > /tmp/1
> echo bar > /tmp/2
> echo foo > /tmp/1
> sh: cannot write /tmp/1: Inalid argument

Probably you are right. When I have some time to build and boot 2.6.24
at last, I hope I'll find what this example is about...

> But whatever.   It used to work.  People's scripts will break.  Regression.

Do you mean people didn't have to change their scripts before, e.g.
from linux 2.0.? Scripts are kind of programs, and both APIs and some
'undocumented' features are achanging...

Regards,
Jarek P.

Regards,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html