[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:39:57 -0600
From: Doug Maxey <dwm@...yolf.org>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
cc: Doug Maxey <dwm@...tin.ibm.com>,
Linux PowerPC List <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@...ibm.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...zik.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ehea: fix phyp checkpatch complaints
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:23:45 CST, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:20:50PM -0600, Doug Maxey wrote:
> > /* input param R5 */
> > -#define H_ALL_RES_QP_EQPO EHEA_BMASK_IBM(9, 11)
...
> > +#define H_ALL_RES_QP_EQPO EHEA_BMASK_IBM(9, 11)
...
>
> This was better the way it was (before, it was readable at any tab setting);
> checkpatch is overeager to complain on tab/space issues (it's a bit hard to
> distinguish indentation from alignment with a regex).
In emacs, with no special offsets, the lines appear to still line up.
What did happen was spaces were turned to tabs where applicable.
What editor shows a bad alignment?
++doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists