netdev - Re: tbench regression in 2.6.25-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:40:32 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tbench regression in 2.6.25-rc1

Zhang, Yanmin a écrit :
> On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 12:33 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote: 
>> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:12:38 +0800, "Zhang, Yanmin" said:
>>
>>> I also think __refcnt is the key. I did a new testing by adding 2 unsigned long
>>> pading before lastuse, so the 3 members are moved to next cache line. The performance is
>>> recovered.
>>>
>>> How about below patch? Almost all performance is recovered with the new patch.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@...el.com>
>> Could you add a comment someplace that says "refcnt wants to be on a different
>> cache line from input/output/ops or performance tanks badly", to warn some
>> future kernel hacker who starts adding new fields to the structure?
> Ok. Below is the new patch.
> 
> 1) Move tclassid under ops in case CONFIG_NET_CLS_ROUTE=y. So sizeof(dst_entry)=200
> no matter if CONFIG_NET_CLS_ROUTE=y/n. I tested many patches on my 16-core tigerton by
> moving tclassid to different place. It looks like tclassid could also have impact on
> performance.
> If moving tclassid before metrics, or just don't move tclassid, the performance isn't
> good. So I move it behind metrics.
> 
> 2) Add comments before __refcnt.
> 
> If CONFIG_NET_CLS_ROUTE=y, the result with below patch is about 18% better than
> the one without the patch.
> 
> If CONFIG_NET_CLS_ROUTE=n, the result with below patch is about 30% better than
> the one without the patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@...el.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> --- linux-2.6.25-rc1/include/net/dst.h	2008-02-21 14:33:43.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-2.6.25-rc1_work/include/net/dst.h	2008-02-22 12:52:19.000000000 +0800
> @@ -52,15 +52,10 @@ struct dst_entry
>  	unsigned short		header_len;	/* more space at head required */
>  	unsigned short		trailer_len;	/* space to reserve at tail */
>  
> -	u32			metrics[RTAX_MAX];
> -	struct dst_entry	*path;
> -
> -	unsigned long		rate_last;	/* rate limiting for ICMP */
>  	unsigned int		rate_tokens;
> +	unsigned long		rate_last;	/* rate limiting for ICMP */
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ROUTE
> -	__u32			tclassid;
> -#endif
> +	struct dst_entry	*path;
>  
>  	struct neighbour	*neighbour;
>  	struct hh_cache		*hh;
> @@ -70,10 +65,20 @@ struct dst_entry
>  	int			(*output)(struct sk_buff*);
>  
>  	struct  dst_ops	        *ops;
> -		
> -	unsigned long		lastuse;
> +
> +	u32			metrics[RTAX_MAX];
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ROUTE
> +	__u32			tclassid;
> +#endif
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * __refcnt wants to be on a different cache line from
> +	 * input/output/ops or performance tanks badly
> +	 */
>  	atomic_t		__refcnt;	/* client references	*/
>  	int			__use;
> +	unsigned long		lastuse;
>  	union {
>  		struct dst_entry *next;
>  		struct rtable    *rt_next;
> 
> 
> 

I prefer this patch, but unfortunatly your perf numbers are for 64 bits kernels.

Could you please test now with 32 bits one ?

Thank you
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html