netdev - Re: linux-next: Tree for March 29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:12:55 +0100
From:	Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 29

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Status of my local build tests is at
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next.  If maintainers want to give
> advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add
> more builds.

I see both avr32 builds currently fail, but for different
reasons...none of which is avr32-specific as far as I can tell.

defconfig fails with

drivers/ata/libata-core.c:127: error: 'ata_pci_default_filter' undeclared here (not in a function)

which seems to be due to CONFIG_ATA && !CONFIG_PCI

allnoconfig fails with

include/linux/netdevice.h:843: error: implicit declaration of function 'dev_net'

which seems to be because the definition of dev_net is inside #ifdef
CONFIG_NET, while next_net_device, which calls it, is not.

Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html