netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:48:37 -0500
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To:	avorontsov@...mvista.com
CC:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup

Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:13:36AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Mar 11, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>>> - get rid of `model = "UCC"' in the ucc nodes
>>>  It isn't used anywhere, so remove it. If we'll ever need something
>>>  like this, we'll use compatible property instead.
>>> - replace cell-index and device-id properties by fsl,ucc.
>>>
>>> Drivers are modified for backward compatibility's sake.
>> I'd prefer we use cell-index and not introduce "fsl,ucc".  I'm ok with  
>> dropping device-id and model (its implied in the compatiable).
> 
> Ok. Here it is. netdev and linux-serial Cc'ed.

Do we want the first UCC to have a cell-index of 1?  Maybe we should fix this
off-by-one error once and for all, and number all UCCs from 0?

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html