netdev - Re: [PATCH] Expose netdevice dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 20 Apr 2008 04:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dwmw2@...radead.org
Cc:	kay.sievers@...y.org, md@...ux.it, harald@...hat.com,
	linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	schwidefsky@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Expose netdevice dev_id through sysfs

From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:12:46 +0100

> The reason I still submitted it, after realising that Marco's objections
> to letting udev rely on the 'KERNEL==' match were bogus, is because I
> think it does still help on S390 -- it lets us remove the special case
> hack there.
> 
> I don't think it's actually _broken_ on S390 at the moment; just a bit
> icky. That was sufficient motivation to still submit the patch :)

Fair enough.

Why don't you do the following?  Respin the patch with some
added verbiage in the changelog entry based upon what we've
discussed here and I'll apply the patch.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html