netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] Re: WAN: new PPP code for generic HDLC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	paulkf@...rogate.com
Cc:	khc@...waw.pl, jchapman@...alix.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jeff@...zik.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Re: WAN: new PPP code for generic HDLC

From: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@...rogate.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:46:27 -0600

> The response is usually "support the simpler generic
> HDLC PPP way of doing things or we will go elsewhere".

Users say this to strong-hand developers, it's not something you
should ever take very seriously.  And even if Linux may simply not be
for them, well that's fine too, and implementing something as obscure
as HDLC PPP one way or the other is not going to change that.

I mean, be realistic here.

Are we going to have three copies of code implementing the same
thing because some HDLC PPP users threatened to defect?  That's
simply rediculious.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html