netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/5] mv643xx_eth: allow multiple instances

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:51:30 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
CC:	Dale Farnsworth <dale@...nsworth.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mv643xx_eth: allow multiple instances

Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> This (bisectable) patch series (posted previously to netdev@ on Mar
> 17 and on Mar 19) allows instantiating multiple mv643xx_eth instances,
> which is necessary for newer chips that contain multiple mv643xx_eth
> silicon blocks, and adds support for programming mv643xx_eth's mbus
> address window registers.
> 
> These five patches were not merged in the initial batch of
> mv643xx_eth patches that went into 2.6.25-git because they depend
> on a0916bd64a0e6636f0161480e04057c89e90c5da ("[POWERPC] mv643xx_eth:
> Prepare to support multiple silicon blocks") to be merged first,
> which has now been merged (via the powerpc tree.)

looks fine to me.  I'll assume the maintainer will send me a pull 
request or something...


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html