netdev - Re: [PATCH] [NET] warn when accounting an skb that already has a destructor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 May 2008 12:43:25 +0300 (EEST)
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	johannes@...solutions.net, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [NET] warn when accounting an skb that already has a
 destructor

On Mon, 5 May 2008, David Miller wrote:

> From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 09:31:15 +0200
> 
> > If we decide to uninline those functions for another reason (used too
> > much, code size, ...) then we can still do that.
> 
> Agreed.

According to my measurements the size bloat of those two is
(x86/32bit, gcc 4.1.2 redhat something):

-1091  40 funcs, 89 +, 1180 -, diff: -1091 --- skb_set_owner_r
-495  46 funcs, 70 +, 565 -, diff: -495 --- skb_set_owner_w

-- 
 i.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html