netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/9] Removed bogus 'fall-thru' comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 7 May 2008 23:30:08 +0300 (EEST)
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
cc:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] Removed bogus 'fall-thru' comments

On Wed, 7 May 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:

> Fall-through is expected outside a switch statement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/sfc/falcon.c |    2 --
>  drivers/net/sfc/rx.c     |    1 -
>  2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/falcon.c b/drivers/net/sfc/falcon.c
> index 46db549..9cac344 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/sfc/falcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/falcon.c
> @@ -2468,14 +2468,12 @@ int falcon_probe_nic(struct efx_nic *efx)
>   fail5:
>  	falcon_free_buffer(efx, &efx->irq_status);
>   fail4:
> -	/* fall-thru */
>   fail3:
>  	if (nic_data->pci_dev2) {
>  		pci_dev_put(nic_data->pci_dev2);
>  		nic_data->pci_dev2 = NULL;
>  	}
>   fail2:
> -	/* fall-thru */
>   fail1:
>  	kfree(efx->nic_data);
>  	return rc;

Is there really any point in keeping those extra goto targets? I'd suggest 
that you simply eliminate the extra ones completely.


-- 
 i.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html