lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 01:26:06 -0500 From: Ben Liblit <liblit@....org> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, mchan@...adcom.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, john.ronciak@...el.com Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10600] New: e1000 updates rx_bytes infrequently David Miller wrote: > You're missing a zero in that string, it's "e1000e" not "e100e", and > did you make sure to enable CONFIG_E1000E in your kernel config? Sorry, that was a typo in my comment but not in my actual experiments. I used "e1000e", not "e100e". CONFIG_E1000E is enabled, and "lsmod" confirmed that the e1000e module was definitely loaded into the kernel. "The kernel", for the record, is the current Fedora 8 kernel, 2.6.24.5-85.fc8. I realize that pristine, self-built kernels are preferred for bug reporting. I am currently building my own 2.6.25.3 so that I can affirm or refute Jesse Brandeburg's claim (comment #12) that this bug is fixed in 2.6.25-rc1 and later. I'll report my findings when available, assuming I still remember how to install my own kernels. (Yes, yes, I've gotten soft and lazy.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists