netdev - Re: [GIT PULL net-2.6] IPv6 fixes.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:33:54 -0400
From:	Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
To:	Shan Wei <shanwei@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 
	<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL net-2.6] IPv6 fixes.

Shan Wei wrote:
>> +			if (addr_type != IPV6_ADDR_ANY) {
>> +				if (!ipv6_chk_addr(&init_net, &src_info->ipi6_addr,
>> +						   addr_type & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL ? dev : NULL, 0))
>>
> if ipi6_ifindex==2(eth0) and the ipi6_addr is loopback addr or multicast addr,
> ipv6_chk_addr() will return ture.

Won't ipv6_chk_addr() fail if given a multicast address since it's
looking in inet6_addr_lst[]?

Anyways, I've created a little chart showing the before/after
differences based on Yoshifuji's latest patch:

Behavior today:

src/ifindex	result
-----------	------

::/0		SUCCESS (packet sent on lo)
::/1 (lo)	SUCCESS (packet sent on lo)
::/3 (eth0)	SUCCESS (packet sent on lo)
::/27		SUCCESS (packet sent on lo)

::1/0		SUCCESS (packet sent on lo)
::1/1 (lo)	SUCCESS (packet sent on lo)
::1/3 (eth0)	SUCCESS (packet sent on lo)
::1/27		SUCCESS (packet sent on lo)

ff02::1/0	EINVAL
ff02::1/1	EINVAL
ff02::1/3	EINVAL
ff02::1/27	ENODEV


With patch, differences shown with **:

src/ifindex	result
-----------	------

::/0		SUCCESS (packet sent on lo)
::/1 (lo)	SUCCESS (packet sent on lo)
::/3 (eth0)	SUCCESS (packet sent on lo)
::/27		ENODEV **

::1/0		SUCCESS (packet sent on lo)
::1/1 (lo)	SUCCESS (packet sent on lo)
::1/3 (eth0)	EINVAL **
::1/27		ENODEV **

ff02::1/0	EINVAL
ff02::1/1	EINVAL
ff02::1/3	EINVAL
ff02::1/27	ENODEV


Is that change good with you?

-Brian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html