lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:40:16 -0700
From:	Karen Shaeffer <shaeffer@...ralscape.com>
To:	Ayaz Abdulla <AAbdulla@...dia.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, jgarzik@...ox.com,
	manfred@...orfullife.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: msi interrupts

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 02:19:31PM -0700, Ayaz Abdulla wrote:
> Yes, that would be great!

Hi Ayaz,
How far back should it be back ported? Do you know?
Thanks,
Karen

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@...ux-foundation.org] 
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 2:11 PM
> To: Ayaz Abdulla
> Cc: jgarzik@...ox.com; manfred@...orfullife.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: msi interrupts
> 
> 
> On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:04:05 -0400
> Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@...dia.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:15:32 -0400
> > > Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@...dia.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > >>Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:51:46 -0400
> > >>>Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@...dia.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > This patch adds a workaround for lost MSI interrupts. There is a
> race
> > >>> > condition in the HW in which future interrupts could be missed.
> The
> > >>> > workaround is to toggle the MSI irq mask.
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>>Do you think this is a 2.6.26 thing?
> > >>
> > >>It is by HW design, not related to the kernel.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Sorry, what I meant was: do you believe that this patch should be in
> > > 2.6.26?
> > Yes, it should be treated as a critical fix.
> 
> So should it also be backported into 2.6.25.x?
> 
> Bear in mind that $major_distros are apparently basing product on
> 2.6.25.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
> confidential information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
> is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
> reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
---end quoted text---

-- 
 Karen Shaeffer
 Neuralscape, Palo Alto, Ca. 94306
 shaeffer@...ralscape.com  http://www.neuralscape.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ