lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:12:57 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com> To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com> CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] sfc fix for 2.6.27 Ben Hutchings wrote: > Jeff, > > Please add the following patch to your changes for 2.6.27. > > Ben. > > Ben Hutchings (1): > sfc: I2C adapter initialisation fixes > > drivers/net/sfc/falcon.c | 12 +++--------- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) You're getting the email subject line a bit wrong. If it says "[PATCH]", one expects the email to actually contain a patch... The normal options for including comments are: 1) If it's a single patch, include meta-comments like "for 2.6.27, not 2.6.26" after the "---" separator. See Documentation/SubmittingPatches for more information. 2) If it's multiple patches, include exposition in a separate email numbered zero. Example subject lines of three emails: [PATCH 0/2] sfc: patchset to do cool and nifty stuff (summarizes the patchset) [PATCH 1/2] sfc: add support for nifty feature bamboozle [PATCH 2/2] sfc: remove support for silly feature zappadoo (individual patches) Regards, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists