netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/3] netdevice: order of synchronization of IFF_PROMISC and IFF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:06:36 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	NETDEV <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] netdevice: order of synchronization of IFF_PROMISC
 and IFF_ALLMULTI

Wang Chen wrote:
> Patrick McHardy said the following on 2008-6-16 18:03:
>> Wang Chen wrote:
>>> And about the comment, I copy it from dev_change_flags() and think
>>> it seems suit for here.
>>> Did I misunderstand this comment?
>> I think it refers to broken behaviour by drivers that set
>> IFF_PROMISC themselves when asked to disable multicast
>> filtering by setting IFF_ALLMULTI. This would cause the
>> test for changed flags in dev_set_promiscuity to return zero
>> and not program the device for promiscous mode properly.
>>
> 
> Do you mean things like that in do_mc32_set_multicast_list()?

Yes.

>> There are a few examples of this in the tree. But calling
>> dev_set_promiscuity() before dev_set_allmulti() only helps
>> in the dev_change_flags() case since its the only function
>> that might change both flags at once. In all other cases it
>> depends on the caller.
>>
>> So for the dev_change_flags() case VLAN already uses the
>> "proper" ordering, the other cases might be broken with
>> or without your patch.
>>
> 
> Is there any other case might be broken?

If that ordering is really required, yes:

- ip link set dev eth0 allmulticast on

<sets allmulticast *and* promisous with broken driver>

- ip link set dev eth0 promisc on

<no change>

So the only thing fixed by this workaround is of both are
enabled in a single command - something that doesn't even
make much sense since promisc will receive all multicast
frames anyway.

>> I'd suggest to fix the drivers instead, perhaps start by
>> adding a warning to dev_change_flags() that is triggered
>> by the driver changing the flags itself.
>>
> 
> In some driver's code of *_set_multicast_list(), IFF_PROMISC
> will be set if IFF_ALLMULTI is set.
> And there is comment about the necessity for setting IFF_PROMISC.
> /*
>  *	We must make the kernel realise we had to move
>  *	into promisc mode or we start all out war on
>  *	the cable. If it was a promisc request the
>  *	flag is already set. If not we assert it.
>  */
> So, I doubt about fixing the drivers.


I have no idea what this comment is trying to say. Drivers
shouldn't change dev->flags.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html