netdev - Re: [PATCH 10/10] pxa: make littleton to use the new smc91x platform data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:58:07 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
CC:	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Eric Miao <eric.miao@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] pxa: make littleton to use the new smc91x platform
 data

Eric Miao wrote:
> From: Eric Miao <eric.miao@...vell.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@...vell.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/littleton.c |    9 +++++++++
>  drivers/net/smc91x.h          |    3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

The rest of the patches seem OK.

What do ARM people prefer -- should I ACK this series, and let it be 
merged via an ARM tree?

The series is mainly platform-oriented rather than net-oriented.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html