netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/04]: VLAN vs. packet socket inconsistencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	kaber@...sh.net
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/04]: VLAN vs. packet socket inconsistencies

From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:30:04 +0200

> That sounds good. Userspace needs to know about the size of
> the tpacket_hdr before setting the ring parameters so it can
> size the ring frames appropriately for the largest packet size
> it wants to receive. This means the offset field in the
> tpacket_hdr is redundant, so I'll just add a getsockopt
> option for getting the size. Unless we want to be able to
> include only a partial tpacket_hdr, but I don't think that
> would be very useful.

Ok, in that case using a getsockopt() to query the size sounds great.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html