lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:06:39 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Julius Volz <juliusv@...gle.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/wireless/nl80211.c: fix endless Netlink callback
	loop.

On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 14:02 +0200, Julius Volz wrote:
> Although I only tested similar code (I don't use any of this wireless
> code), the state maintainance between Netlink dump callback invocations
> seems wrong here and should lead to an endless loop. There are also other
> examples in the same file which might have the same problem. Perhaps someone
> can actually test this (or refute my logic).
> 
> Take the simple example with only one element in the list (which should fit
> into the message):

> Also, iterations where the filling of an element fails should not be counted as
> completed, so idx should not be incremented in this case.

Seems to be the case on both points, however,

> --- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
> +++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
> @@ -194,22 +194,24 @@ static int nl80211_send_wiphy(struct sk_buff *msg, u32 pid, u32 seq, int flags,
>  static int nl80211_dump_wiphy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
>  {
>  	int idx = 0;
>  	int start = cb->args[0];
>  	struct cfg80211_registered_device *dev;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&cfg80211_drv_mutex);
>  	list_for_each_entry(dev, &cfg80211_drv_list, list) {
> -		if (++idx < start)
> +		if (++idx <= start)
>  			continue;
>  		if (nl80211_send_wiphy(skb, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).pid,
>  				       cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq, NLM_F_MULTI,
> -				       dev) < 0)
> +				       dev) < 0) {
> +			idx--;
>  			break;
> +		}

I see much of the problem stemming from incrementing 'idx' at the
beginning of the loop, can't we just move it to the end?

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists