netdev - Re: iproute2 proposal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:09:52 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
CC:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iproute2 proposal

Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
>> On Wednesday 06 August 2008, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> It breaks batches that add links and then configure them. You need
>>> to invalidate the link map on "ip link add/del" and "ip tunnel add/del".
>  >
>> Probably for tc batch it doesn't matter, so this optimization can be 
>> done only for tc (i exclude also monitor functions, they must renew 
>> list of interfaces).
> 
> I'm not sure I understand you correctly. It matters *only* for
> tc batch since otherwise the ll map needs to be generated anyways.

Ok I noticed the misunderstanding. Yes, it doesn't matter for
tc, only for ip.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html