netdev - Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably problem with fpu state changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:54:13 -0700
From:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	Wolfgang Walter <wolfgang.walter@...m.de>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"viro@...IV.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"vegard.nossum@...il.com" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably problem with fpu state changes

On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 11:12:19AM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> In this padlock case with the patch, we may encounter a nested
> kernel_fpu_begin() and end()
> but this is ok, as the padlock is not actually touching fpu/sse registers.

I take this back. kernel_fpu_end() is unconditionally doing stts(). So,
nesting of kernel_fpu_begin/end() is not ok.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html