netdev - Re: [PATCH RESEND] ipv6: return with appropriate error code when sending RH0 using setsockopt()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	shanwei@...fujitsu.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ipv6: return with appropriate error code when
 sending RH0 using setsockopt()

From: Shan Wei <shanwei@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:41:06 +0800

>  I'm sorry to resend the patch, for that no one replied it from Jun 27.
> 
>  The kernel had removed the RH0(Type 0 Routing Header), but we can still
>  send IPv6 packet with RH0 using sendmsg() or setsockopt().
> 
>  Compare with sendmsg() that returns EINVAL, but setsockopt() return EPERM.
>  The patch fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <shanwei@...fujitsu.com>

I've tried to defer IPV6 patches that have semantic issues to an
expert such as Yoshifuji-san, but he has dropped off the face of the
planet for a while.

I'll take a look at this if I get a chance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html