netdev - Re: [PATCH 20/38] netns ct: NOTRACK in netns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:25:10 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
CC:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/38] netns ct: NOTRACK in netns

Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>>> I think you could avoid this mess by using a struct nf_conntrack
>>>> for the untracked conntrack instead of struct nf_conn. It shouldn't
>>>> make any difference since its ignored anyways.
>>> Ewww, can I?
>> I hope so :) A different possiblity suggest by Pablo some time ago
>> would be to mark untracked packets in skb->nfctinfo and not
>> attach a conntrack at all.
> 
> Indeed, I remember that :). I left that patch of the table time ago [1].
> There's a nf_reset call missing as Patrick said at that time. I can
> recover it if you like the idea.

I think that would be a good idea.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html