netdev - Re: atl1: WARNING at net/sched/sch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jacliburn@...lsouth.net
Cc:	adobriyan@...il.com, csnook@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: atl1: WARNING at net/sched/sch_generic.c:221

From: Jay Cliburn <jacliburn@...lsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:26:54 -0500

> Should a netdev driver be coded such that a watchdog transmit timeout
> never occurs?
> 
> [ 2086.049998] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (atl1): transmit timed out
> 
> Or is a watchdog timeout an expected occurrence if a cable is
> unplugged/plugged?

If the cable is unplugged, netif_carrier_off() will be (or should
be) invoked by the driver, and that cancels the watchdog timer.

This is all from memory since I'm travelling and don't have the
time to check this directly.  You should investigate this yourself
instead of asking me if you want a truly definitive answer :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html