netdev - Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:38:07 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 03:11:25PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> There are a lot of clean and good fixes, but that is not the
> criteria for outside-of-the merge-window submissions right now.
> 
> Linus has made this clear.

He continues to take non-regression fixes and minor cosmetic commits
from other trees.

The basic idea is to BALANCE the lateness of -rc with the seriousness of
the problem being fixed, and the technical complexity of the fix itself.

The later the -rc, the more you need to take into account how likely it
is to create additional problems.  But did you READ the patches and
extended commit descriptions, to see if additional problems were likely?

Late -rc does not mean "no bug fixes at all except regressions" if you
look at the commits going into the kernel tree.

Late -rc does not mean putting off memory corruption fixes for 6 months.

	Jeff

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html