| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:52:22 +1000 From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> To: Julius Volz <juliusv@...gle.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, csnook@...hat.com, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Should we move IPVS out of net/ipv4 now? On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:04:28PM +0200, Julius Volz wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:14 PM, David Miller wrote: > > From: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com> > > Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:37:33 -0400 > > > >> Julius Volz wrote: > >> > Since IPVS now does partial IPv6, should we finally move it from > >> > "net/ipv4/ipvs" to "net" or to "net/netfilter"? I posted that patch a > >> > long time ago, but that was before any of the actual v6 features, so > >> > there was probably no interest. > >> > >> Whatever the netfilter people want is fine with me. > > > > I think, especially in the long term, putting IPVS under net/netfilter/ > > is the right thing to do. > > Ok thanks, I'll send the patch for that once lvs-next-2.6 or > net-next-2.6 builds for ARCH=um again (there seems to be some breakage > at the moment)... Once net-next-2.6 is working again, let me know and I'll pull it into lvs-next-2.6. -- Simon Horman VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office H: www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: www.valinux.co.jp/en -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists