netdev - Re: Mark IPW2100 as BROKEN: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware restart.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:02:03 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ipw2100-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhu@...el.com,
	reinette.chatre@...el.com, jgarzik@...ox.com,
	linville@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: Mark IPW2100 as BROKEN: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware
 restart.

On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:57:06 +0400
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> wrote:

> > > Consider for inclusing for the upcoming kernel to get wider
> > > notifications. Yes, it is not a bugfix, I know.
> > 
> > still more complex than needed; a WARN_ON_ONCE() will be enough.
> 
> That allows to dump whatever number of warnings you want. The more we
> have, the louder will be customers scream.

artificially increasing numbers isn't going to do that; it just shows
you're more interested in making a stink than in getting something
improved ;(

> 


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html